It seems even the simplest of issues becomes a conflict in decision making. I had a "trigger finger"in my right index finger on the right hand. Got a shot and it fixed it immediately after dealing with the problem for several weeks.
So then I got trigger finger in the ring finger on the right hand. Well, I thought, optimistically, a shot will fix that up too. Got the shot. Nothing, the finger kept locking up only it hurt more. I got a splint for it, kept putting glucosamine liquid on it and went back for the follow-up appointment SIX weeks later.
Since that shot didn't work, the doctor gave me the choice of either getting another shot now and making an appointment SIX weeks out for surgery if the shot doesn't work. Or not get the shot and in 5-7 days someone will call me to set up a day for surgery, probably SIX weeks out. He said surgery will fix it and I will have 3 weeks of recovery and the finger will be fixed immediately. But, either way nothing will be fixed for at least SIX weeks. Since the first shot in this finger didn't work I thought there was very little possibility that a second shot would work and then I'd have wasted another $50 on co-pay. On my income that's huge. I consulted with my granddaughter who had accompanied me to the doctor visit and she agreed with me to opt for the surgery hoping that I'll be called earlier and perhaps the surgery could be scheduled earlier than SIX weeks. SIX must be a magical number!
I'm assuming that this red tape has to do with insurance requirements and nothing at all to do with the doctor's schedule or the patient's need. I can't help it everybody; it just reeks of being all about the money.