I’m going on 6 years at 2-3 pads/day and I’m extremely active for a newly 76 yrs. You must have meant 2-3 per day-RIGHT?
I’ve said before that urologists’ stats of 80-90% continence after RP and 2-3 years is an extreme exaggeration. Where do the numbers come from? Are they actually estimates/guesses that are made after they perform other surgeries, i.e., AUS, Sling, etc. Patients and Docs move, retire, die, etc. making stats extremely questionable. Are the Docs trying to take the sting out of the cancer DX with promises of minimal side effects? I think age (50-60) at time of RP is most critical for one’s progress to TOTAL continence, never mind ED at any age after RP.
BTW, good luck with achieving total continence. Surgeries as we all know have side effects that we excuse Docs from with our sign offs. So if you try any continence surgeries make sure you don’t expect to not need pads.