Archives1
Staff member
A little background: I was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis in 1988, and with primary sclerosing cholangitis (chronic bile duct inflammation) in 2001. My colitis has been pretty quiet for most of the past 20 years, but the first dozen or so years were almost nonstop bloody diarrhea. PSC is a progressive disease, so since my first real symptoms in 2010 or it's slowly gotten worse. My liver is at the point of just starting to get cirrhotic, and I anticipate needing a transplant in the next few years.
UC with PSC carries a very high risk for both liver and colon cancer. I get an MRI/MRCP yearly to look for liver cancer, and I get a colonoscopy every year to look for colon cancer. I'm 50, but by now I've had somewhere around 20 colonoscopies.
My annual colonoscopy in April came back with low grade dysplasia in one biopsy from my transverse colon. My doctor suggested a 6-month recheck, and my September colonoscopy results just came back with no dysplasia except for one biopsy in my ascending colon that was indeterminate for dysplasia because of active inflammation.
My doctor recommended continuing colonoscopies twice a year, with the next one on June. I've read a lot of the medical literature, though, and it seems that there is some disagreement among doctors about whether to perform a proctocolectomy after a single result of our grade dysplasia. It starts that there's a 30% or so chance that they'll find high grade dysplasia or cancer on examination if they do take my colon out, even if they only found one spot of low grade dysplasia on colonoscopy. But other doctors refund just watching and waiting.
I'm uncomfortable with just watching and waiting, given the odds that cancer is already present. I suspect that it I push my doctor to remove my colon, he'll probably be willing. I'm likely not a great candidate for a J-pouch, and the idea of having to have 4+ bowel movements a day (and the high probability of at least some anal incontinence) sounds just like being back in the bad old days of my colitis (which was 10-20+ BMs a day for years). So if I have my colon removed, they'll probably do a permanent ileostomy and remove my rectum and anus in the bargain.
I'm also not entirely comfortable asking for that. It's a huge body change, requiring an ileostomy bag for the rest of my life.
But then again, it removes any chance that I'll get colon cancer, and it eliminates having to get a colonoscopy every year. It also makes sure that up never have another UC flare-up.
So if this leaves me feeling torn. I'd actually how'd that they're find more dysplasia on my last colonoscopy so that the party forward was obvious. Instead, it just muddied the waters with finding indeterminate dysplasia.
If I get an ileostomy, I've already brought up to my urologist the idea of getting a urinary diversion with urostomy, which would possibly eliminate my interstitial cystitis and my urinary incontinence. She want terribly receptive to the idea, but I could probably convince her. Having two bags isn't much side than having one, and it would mean that I wouldn't be diapers anymore. She pointed out that even bladder removal doesn't guarantee relieving bladder pain, though - IC is notorious for still causing pain even after the bladder is removed. And it's very major surgery, mostly to eliminate needing diapers.
I don't know what to do. What I really want is a clear path forward, but what I have is big choices that will affect the rest of my life with no clear best choice.
UC with PSC carries a very high risk for both liver and colon cancer. I get an MRI/MRCP yearly to look for liver cancer, and I get a colonoscopy every year to look for colon cancer. I'm 50, but by now I've had somewhere around 20 colonoscopies.
My annual colonoscopy in April came back with low grade dysplasia in one biopsy from my transverse colon. My doctor suggested a 6-month recheck, and my September colonoscopy results just came back with no dysplasia except for one biopsy in my ascending colon that was indeterminate for dysplasia because of active inflammation.
My doctor recommended continuing colonoscopies twice a year, with the next one on June. I've read a lot of the medical literature, though, and it seems that there is some disagreement among doctors about whether to perform a proctocolectomy after a single result of our grade dysplasia. It starts that there's a 30% or so chance that they'll find high grade dysplasia or cancer on examination if they do take my colon out, even if they only found one spot of low grade dysplasia on colonoscopy. But other doctors refund just watching and waiting.
I'm uncomfortable with just watching and waiting, given the odds that cancer is already present. I suspect that it I push my doctor to remove my colon, he'll probably be willing. I'm likely not a great candidate for a J-pouch, and the idea of having to have 4+ bowel movements a day (and the high probability of at least some anal incontinence) sounds just like being back in the bad old days of my colitis (which was 10-20+ BMs a day for years). So if I have my colon removed, they'll probably do a permanent ileostomy and remove my rectum and anus in the bargain.
I'm also not entirely comfortable asking for that. It's a huge body change, requiring an ileostomy bag for the rest of my life.
But then again, it removes any chance that I'll get colon cancer, and it eliminates having to get a colonoscopy every year. It also makes sure that up never have another UC flare-up.
So if this leaves me feeling torn. I'd actually how'd that they're find more dysplasia on my last colonoscopy so that the party forward was obvious. Instead, it just muddied the waters with finding indeterminate dysplasia.
If I get an ileostomy, I've already brought up to my urologist the idea of getting a urinary diversion with urostomy, which would possibly eliminate my interstitial cystitis and my urinary incontinence. She want terribly receptive to the idea, but I could probably convince her. Having two bags isn't much side than having one, and it would mean that I wouldn't be diapers anymore. She pointed out that even bladder removal doesn't guarantee relieving bladder pain, though - IC is notorious for still causing pain even after the bladder is removed. And it's very major surgery, mostly to eliminate needing diapers.
I don't know what to do. What I really want is a clear path forward, but what I have is big choices that will affect the rest of my life with no clear best choice.